I had the same conversation with Zeljka about six years ago. I thought the PTM would be a great loss leader, and they’d sell more than enough PCMs to recoup the investment.
The two are a team. Without the PCM, the hub PTM, has little value. But the PCM does have limited broadcast capabilty,
within a tournament hall to communicate with the PTM. But, I do think the question remains, at its current sales price
how long can the PCM device be attractive to a key market–upwardly mobile (ratings-wise) scholastic chess players??
Really, how many in this market have any concern whatsoever for broadcast capability when used with a PTM??
No one can actually provide any documentation that MonRoi was in fact approved by the Technical Commission. It has always been assumed that it was because of a partnership.
In fact, you won’t find any regulations for electronic scoresheets at all by the Technical Commission, QC, or RTRC. That’s because they don’t exist. It was supposed to be discussed two years ago at the Estonia Congress but was postponed until the MonRoi contract expired.
You also won’t find any regulations stopping the usage of other electronic scoresheets and the power for the Chief Arbiter to allow the presence and use of ‘electronic devices’ with his/her permission.