Microadvertising - Advertising Chess on Facebook and Google

I have recently started experimenting with advertisements for Chess tournaments using Facebook and Google. I wanted to share my experience, make some suggestions, and solicit suggestions from others.

First, the good side. It’s cheap. It’s very cheap. My advertising budgets for my ad campaigns have been $1.00 per day. For that, my ad has been placed thousands of times in tightly targeted areas. Second, it’s fun. It’s $1.00 a day, and it’s cool when you get a “click”, or even better when someone “likes” your page. I might run the ads for a week at a time. So, for the cost of lunch at McDonalds, I get a weeks worth of cheap entertainment following my ad statistics.

So does it work? Sort of. The first time I tried it, I did have one person show up at my tournament who had not been to one in many years, but saw my Facebook ad. One guy doesn’t sound like a lot, but mine are small tournaments to begin with. One guy is a measurable percentage, and our tournaments are built one guy at a time.

I would like to see other organizers do this, because I have the feeling that if people were to see advertisments for Chess tournaments, it would help all of us. It would help bring Chess a little bit closer to a mainstream activity. What that means is that your tournament benefits a little bit from my ad, and vice versa. This is especially true on Facebook, where when you “like” someone’s page, that can generate a ripple effect through friend networks. (Of course, all this time youare bbeing coopted into advertising networks,but if you are on Facebook at all, you must realize that there’s no privacy associated with anything you do there. You might as well be coopted into a Chess advertisement as anything else.)

One argument I have heard against it is that “no one looks at those ads anyway.” That’s almost true, but not quite. It’s true that my first Facebook ad campaign had over 60,000 views, and right about 60 clicks. That might seem dismal, but it still means I got a bit of exposure to a very wide audience for a very low price, and at least one person actually came to my tournament as a result.

That’s all for now. If you have questions about my experience or how to go about it, feel free to ask. Meanwhile, if you have suggestions about other ways to use 21st century media to promote Chess tournaments, I’m open to suggestions.

I would recommend having more than just 1 term in your microtarget (if you’re not already). Chess should be the base one that always stays, but then change the others around and use other ones.

I’m not big on Google Ad Words really, never have been. I have friends with businesses and they use Google, and even for the $$ they spend (and they are spending 5-digits monthly) they are not satisfied. They had better results with putting more money in FB campaigns and other social media campaigns.

There are a couple more techniques that I’m about to try. Once I get them off the ground and get results back I’ll let you all know.

Based on my limited experience, I’ve been more satisfied with Facebook than with Google. My cost per click has been lower. Facebook allows “pay per thousand impression” marketing, and I think that’s better for what we are doing. Google adwords allows only “pay per click”.

Yes, I have many terms in my google adwords accounts, including “Seirawan” and “Seirawan Chess” but those haven’t had any hits yet, except for my own test searches. For what it’s worth, “chess” is not one of my keywords. I figure if someone is going to google and typing in “chess” all by itself, they probably aren’t looking for an over the board Chess tournament. I do include phrases such as “chess tournament”.

One thing I do is post TLA in all the various chess calendars. I just spent some time posting events on the Scholastic Chess Calendar for Washington and Oregon. It is free and has several good features.http://www.calendarwiz.com/calendars/calendar.php?crd=nwsrsevents&
Try to get all the events posted having to do with the 113th US Open to be held in Vancouver WA Aug 4-12, 2012.

I take it that you pay by the impression rather than by the clickthrough, then?

On Facebook, that’s what I did. Google doesn’t allow it.

Good topic. I am not a Facebook user and the review above for Google was not promising, but I like the idea. My plans for the immediate future are more traditional: I will be trying a print TLA in addition to an online TLA. I also recently added my weekly event to a Google spreadsheet that a location organizer created as a type of clearinghouse.