PN1 G. Atwood - Philidor, 1794
PN2 G. Atwood - J.Wilson, 1801
PN3 W.Lewis - J. Wilson, 1819
PN4 W.Lewis - A. Deschapelle, 1821
PN5 Cochrane - A. Deschapelle, 1821
PN6 Cochrane - Staunton, 1841
PN7 Staunton - A. Anderssen, 1851
PN8 Anderssen - Morphy, 1858
Anderssen was a PN7 and MN1.
Morphy was a PN8 and MN0.
I wonder what Philidor’s Ruy Lopez Number is?
I suspect it’s significantly lower than 8: Saint-Amant and a consultation partner played against Morphy in 1858, and also played against Deschapelles.
Good call billbrock!
NEW:
PN5 St.Amant - Deschapelles, 1836
PN6 St.Amant - Morphy, 1858
Making Morphy at least a PN6.
dwl1945:
Good call billbrock!
NEW:
PN5 St.Amant - Deschapelles, 1836
PN6 St.Amant - Morphy, 1858
Making Morphy at least a PN6.
I would like to think that Fischer was Capablanca in a previous life, making his Capablance number 1
and that Capablanca was Morphy in a previous like, making Capa’s Morphy number 1.
Perhapa Morphy was Philidor in a previous life?
@ David Ames:
I agree with your keen insight.
After all, aren’t we all chess progeny of those who mated each other in the past?
I think I have a little Bogolyubov in me somewhere with a touch of Reti.
dwl1945:
@ David Ames:
I agree with your keen insight.
After all, aren’t we all chess progeny of those who mated each other in the past?
I think I have a little Bogolyubov in me somewhere with a touch of Reti.
A side note: Don’t Bogolyubov and Amadeus have the same meaning?
Ooh, very linguistically nimble. If you wanted, you could also throw in Karl Gottlieb and Theophilus Thompson for good measure.
Nods. I was gonna mention that Morphy played Staunton in a couple of consultation games.