20251105tz8xb3 - It is throwing an error during validation. Is this a new bug?
I can’t change the event dates either. So I’ll need help with this event to get this fixed so i can submit.
I clicked on it a few times, now it’s showing a start date of 10/23/25 and an end date of 11/13/25 in the section, which won’t validate because it is in the future. Is this a game-a-week sort of event?
Somewhere along the line it picked up a third section, I don’t recall seeing that at first.
See if you can change it now and you should be able to delete section 3 if it is spurious.
We can’t currently search the pending queue by the alphanumeric event primary key, not sure why, I’ve started a ticket on that one. Seems like we need that because a lot of events can have similar names but the primary key should be unique.
Yes, a 4 week, game a week Swiss. The dates just got reversed. The upload had 10/14 to 11/04. In MUIR it was reversed for some reason (though the dates were otherwise right).
I can change the dates now so I’ll just do it manually.
It is a one section event too
Not sure how to report that, looks like the future date confused it or something. I’ll try to write up some kind of ticket on that, but it may not be easy to reproduce.
I’m seeing an upper and lower section in it. Odd. I wonder if the name got it conflated with some other event?
ah yea, could be a UTC conversion bug. I bet if you did the same thing in the evening after 9pm tomorrow with the dates of 11/5 and 10/15 it would replicate.
Are the files available on your side? I can send them if not
Leago tells me they capture all the upload files, maybe they’re as big a data hoarder as I am, so they should be able to look at the files you uploaded from the record key.
Interesting point about the UTC date. I’ll pass this whole thread on to them, good thing you made it otherwise the evidence showing the reversed dates might be lost.
I tried the file upload again today just to see what would happen and the dates are still reversed. This was just a test that I’ll delete but I think the section file itself is in good shape right?
OK, I’ve passed this on.