You’ve rented a nice meeting room for a tournament, and carefully arranged the tables and chairs to make maximum use of it for chess, but it still has a finite capacity. Lots of people show up on tournament day to play - more people than seats! What do you do now?
Possible courses of action:
Advertise in advance that only so many seats are available.
Pros: * No one can say they weren’t warned.
Cons: * People might assume there’s no room for them and not enter, maybe leaving you with empty seats.
- More people may show up anyway, so the problem still exists.
Turn away excess entrants at the door.
Pros: * You don’t have to figure out what to do with them.
Cons: * People came to play chess, and they will be bitterly disappointed if they are turned away.
- If there are no-shows or withdrawals later, there will be empty seats where there could be more players.
Set up additional tables outside the playing room.
Pros: * Everyone gets to enter and play.
Cons: * Additional tables and chairs may not be available. - Host site may not allow it.
- Playing conditions (lighting, noise, etc.) may be undesirable.
Assign byes to excess players.
Pros: * Everyone gets to enter. - Nobody gets more than one bye.
Cons: * Some people will be unhappy to receive a bye, especially if there is an opponent ready and willing. - It’s against the spirit of the tournament rules to assign byes for this reason, if not the letter.
Have the excess players play an abbreviated game when a game finishes and a spot becomes available.
Pros: * Everyone gets to enter and play.
Cons: * Players who come expecting G/90 may balk at playing G/65.
Have the excess players play a full game when a game finishes and a spot becomes available.
Pros: * Everyone gets to enter and play.
Cons: * May delay the next round.
If the excess players are accepted, how do you decide which ones to inconvenience with late starts, hallway seating or byes? If it always falls on the lowest boards, the same player may be hit several times in a row, which would be unfair to him and illegal if the solution involved byes. Maybe a rule analogous to that for byes - lowest boards in which neither player has yet been hit - is more fair. Thoughts?
If there are no-shows, this adds more complications. If there is a board empty because neither player has arrived, the solution is easy, put the excess players there, and if the no-shows arrive late, they will be the ones hit for that round. But if only one player is absent, is it better to make the excess players wait or move for a game that could end up as a forfeit, or put them in that spot and inconvenience the on-time player who was originally going to play there if his opponent arrives late?
My own inclination would be to accept the excess players, and have them play an abbreviated game when a spot becomes available, but do not disturb any games in which at least one player is present.
What are your thoughts and opinions?
P.S. Please no suggestions like “get a bigger room”; that may be impractical and is certainly completely unhelpful on playing day!